英国会计学论文代写：并购的经济利益
英国会计学论文代写：并购的经济利益
并购活动的主要优势是快速增长、竞争减少、资源战略性增加、利益相关者对公司业绩、财务收益和货币价值的满意，以及减少复杂的新的市场渗透。兼并和收购是任何企业跨境扩张最迅速的方法（本，不久，等2006）。此外，如果一家公司与该地区的一家巨大的本土公司合并（米切尔和菲利浦，2011），创新产品进入新市场的风险就会大大降低。并购能在激烈的市场竞争中大大降低市场竞争。例如，如果A公司是一个本国的小企业，与另一个国家的大B公司相比，B公司试图获得A，以减少其自身产品的市场竞争。这种情况下可以通过大众收购奥迪，实现电力市场的主要汽车制造商的一个显示Shantanu等人（2013）。任何一家公司都可以通过兼并和收购来提高其能力、收益，并通过长期的财政观点来增加其收入，而母公司则试图通过这些策略来增加资本收益。但根据（戴维和小英2008），这个策略被认为是有效的由于各种经济和政策的变化也错综复杂的电阻率。在兼并和收购的情况下，最大的受益者是母公司和收购公司的利益相关者。Kjell等人（2011）认为，这是由于合并和收购总是有利可图时，它计划战略。虽然并非所有利益相关者都认为这一战略是成功的，但只有那些旨在提高投资回报率的人才能刺激和鼓励何方（2009）所述的并购交易。利益相关者持有情感价值观，如公司创始人的情感依恋，将无法满足他们从并购的好处中得到的好处。底波拉（1993）也同意，当一家公司被收购时，价值较低的市场份额可能会因剥离而承受短期收益。当与充满活力的公司合并时，总能轻而易举地克服市场准入困难。但彼得（2009）否认其研究中的短期收益，表明新的市场渗透可能是昂贵的计划，关注市场研究与其他直接费用，而且可能需要几个月到几十年才能建立一个潜在的客户支持。
英国会计学论文代写：并购的经济利益
The main advantages of M&A activity is speedy growth, reduction of competition, strategic increase in resources, satisfaction of stakeholders on company’s performance, financial gain and monetary value as well as reduced intricacies new market penetration. Merger and Acquisition is the most rapid method of cross border expansion of any business (Ben-Soon et al 2006). Additionally, the risk involved in the introduction of innovative products to new market can be reduced greatly, if a firm merges with a giant native firm of that region (Mitchell & Phillip, 2011). M & A can reduce the market competitions greatly in the regions where it is severely observed. For example, if the firm A is a native small compared to the giant one B which is of different country, firm B tries to acquire A to reduce its market competition of its own product. This case can be seen in Acquisition of Audi by Volkswagen, one of the leading car manufacturers to achieve the market power showed by Shantanu et al (2013). Any firm can go for Merger and Acquisition for increasing its competencies, benefits, to increase its revenue for long lasting fiscal standpoint for the parent firm who tries to increase the capital gain through these strategies. But according to (David & Xiaoying 2008), this strategy is considered as efficient one due to the resistivity in various economic intricacies and policy changes too. In the case of Merger & Acquisitions, the greatest beneficiaries are the stakeholders of both parent and acquired firms. Kjell et al (2011) argues that this is due to the merger and takeovers always profitable when it is planned strategically. While not every stakeholder will consider this strategy as successful one, only who aims at higher return of investments stimulates and encourages the merger and acquisition dealings stated by Ho et al (2009). Stakeholders, who hold sentimental values like sentimental attachment with founders of the firm, will not satisfy over the benefits they receive over the merits of the merger and acquisitions. Deborah (1993) also agrees that when a company is takeover with less worth of market share may tolerate short-term gains because of stripping. When merging with energetic firm may always conquer beforehand market entrance difficulties quiet easily. But Peter (2009) denies the short term gains in his studies showing that new market penetration may be expensive scheme, concerning about the market research amid other direct expenses, and it might take few months to decades for building a potential client support.
