爱尔兰考克大学论文代写：公司法

爱尔兰考克大学论文代写：公司法

这是一个要求根据14节表的公司规定1985(公司规定1985,1985),联合现有股票的持有者意义不止一个人作为公司的所有者,需要遵守所有调用的共享共同购买或出售,而不是其他。这是一个严格的要求在这个场景中,因为它是由三个老板和尼克没有告诉大卫和乔治当他抵押财产之一苏格兰控股有限公司苏格兰皇家银行(RBS)。进一步,苏格兰皇家银行也放在这一条款给了他们第一个也是唯一一个电荷属性对于违约,将来如果有人试图筹集资金通过再次抵押,浮动电荷的所有者将立即规定所有者试图创建另一个电荷的性质。当这是苏格兰控股有限公司的应用于一个属性,它的劣势了大卫和乔治如果他们决定筹集资金,以偿还他们的债务。因此,他们需要研究尼克和相应的行为在法院对尼克的行为。

因为公司创造法律,他们是pre-dominantly需要由法律的使用(奥马尔,2004)。因此,公司的治理是不可避免地依赖于富有成果的形成及其严格的执行。超越权限的原则允许公司以任何方式似乎超出了他们的权力,这一信条已经被抛弃了越来越多的投资者的参与度和社会包容政策的兴起。因为尼克一直试图出售他的股票没有咨询大卫和乔治,他只是想超出他的权力,因为他没有权力不出去他的股票卖给外人当他没有试图卖给现有股东。进一步,他还抵押财产由苏格兰控股有限公司没有大卫的知识和乔治,和从银行筹集资金给它唯一的电荷性质。尼克的行为在某种程度上给了他权力之大超出了实际的限制,他不能抵押任何公司财产没有通知其他合伙人和创建一个单一的费用,以及使用募集资金供个人使用。

爱尔兰考克大学论文代写：公司法

It is a requirement according to section 14 of Table A of the Companies Regulations 1985 (Companies Regulations 1985, 2014) that joint holders of shares meaning more than one person existing as owners of a company need to adhere to all calls of a share purchase or sale jointly and not otherwise. This is a stringent requirement in this scenario since it is owned by three owners and Nick did not inform David and George when he mortgaged one property of Scottish Holdings Ltd to Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS). Further, the RBS bank also put in a clause which gave them the first and only charge on the property in case of a default and if anyone in the future tries to raise money by again mortgaging it, a floating charge to the owners will stipulate immediately on the owners attempting to create another charge on the property. When this is applied to one property of Scottish Holdings ltd, it has given a disadvantage to David and George if they ever decide to raise money to repay their debts. Thus, they need to research the conduct of Nick and accordingly appeal in the court against the actions of Nick.

Since companies are creations of the law, they are pre-dominantly required to be governed by the use of law (Omar, 2004). Thus, the governance of companies is inevitably dependent on the formation of fruitful law and its stringent enforcement. Ultra Vires is the doctrine of allowing a company to act in a way which seems to be beyond their powers, and this doctrine has been abandoned with the growing investor participation and with the rise of social inclusive policies. Since Nick has been trying to sell his shares without consulting a David and George, he is simply trying to act in way that is beyond his powers, because he is not having nay power to go out and sell his shares to an outsider when he did not attempt to sell it to existing shareholders. Further, he also mortgaged the property owned by Scottish Holdings ltd without the knowledge of David and George, and raised money from a bank by giving it the sole charge on the property. Nick acted in a way which gave him powers beyond his actual limits as he could not mortgage any company property without informing other partners and create a single charge on it, along with using the raised money for personal use.