本代寫論文對恐怖主義的本質進行了全面的界定，並將其與其他形式的政治暴力區分開來。今後，將闡述對恐怖主義的五種不同看法，同時討論如何平衡公民的權利和自由與恐怖主義之間的關系。文章還認為，盡管與伊斯蘭國的關系日益緊張，但必須保持反恐策略與確保公民基本權利和自由之間的平衡，以便討論政府幹預打擊和預防恐怖主義的限度。在此基礎上，將討論分析代寫論文– 恐怖主義的本質 。
The November 13, 2015 attack on Paris signifies that the tension with Islamic State has escalated to another level, and that it exemplified just how simple for terrorists to infiltrate major cities and cause massive casualties (Martin, 2015). The attack struck fear into citizens of the world, fearing that their cities are no longer safe, and the war on their home soil is imminent. However, since the year 2001, global terrorism has been identified as a major international and domestic challenge for almost every nation across the globe. In this context, a number of authorities across the globe are keen in laying emphasis on multi-literalist approaches, in opposition with different terrorism wars, while addressing the major causes related to terrorism instead of merely its manifestations of violence (Richardson, 2007). A number of nations have been actively participating in several international forums, and positively playing roles to approach a more integrated framework on the basis of fighting terrorism by the rules and regulations of law (Bignami, 2007).
This essay analyzes the nature of terrorism with comprehensive definitions that differentiate it from other forms of political violence. Further ahead, five different perspectives will be elaborated for terrorism, while discussing ways to balance rights and freedoms of the citizens from terrorism. The essay also contends that despite the intensifying tensions with the Islamic State, balance between counter-terrorism tactics and ensuring basic rights and freedoms of citizens must be maintained, for discussing the limit to which government can intervene to fight and prevent terrorism. Based on this, key points of conclusion will be drafted.
As a transnational threat, there can only be an effective and thorough addressing of terrorism by the combined attempts related to global community. The networks of terror have been operating across nations that are more often beyond the influence and access of America. The United Nations has been identified as a crucial and significant partner while amplifying and broadening the scope of American efforts for counter- terrorism (Bush, 2009). In the specific sense, it can end up reaching those nations within which there is no sufficient credibility or bilateral relationships with the United States of America for conducting operations. The actions of UN for fighting terrorism have been identified as an integral element regarding the efforts of America for the establishment of international framework in rooting out terrorist activity and violent extremism (Bignami, 2007). The UN has been identified as the main platform to combat global terrorism, bringing nations together for sharing information and resources, coordinating activities of counter- terrorism, and creating frameworks for the assistance of nations which results in weakening and disrupting global networks of terrorism (Martin, 2015). The UN has initiated 7 actions for fighting against terrorism that includes the Committee of Security Council Counter Terrorism, committee of non- proliferation, committee of Taliban and Al Qaeda Sanctions, treaties of counter terrorism, global strategy of counter terrorism, implementation task force of counter terrorism, and to keep weapons out of the hands of terrorist (Bianchi, 2006).