在代写作文-批评话语理论在案例研究中的应用中，话语被认为是语言各部分的组织。还有一个附加的意义隐藏在语言的概念中，增加了构建语言段的整体意义(Van Dijk, 1977)。这一话语分析关注的是社会结构、主体的等级、意识形态、冲突、后现代主义观点和社会变化的动力(莱文森，1981)。在这个案例研究中，所有参与谈话的参与者都要确保他们的每一篇谈话或讲话在语法上是正确的。在这种情况下，语言能力的问题并不存在。尽管人们的语言能力在这篇分析文章中没有被探讨过，但它被认为是为了确保人们的语法是正确的。这是同龄人之间的随意交谈，因此他们遵循了所有的强制性的社会条件和讲话模式的惯例。参加谈话的人都是称职的，他们遵守所有社会语言和战略惯例的规定。接下来有关代写作文-批评话语理论在案例研究中的应用分析如下：
Discourse is considered to be an organization of the segments of the language. There is an additional meaning that is hidden with the notions of the languages that adds to the overall meaning of the construction of the language segment (Van Dijk, 1977). This discourse analysis focuses on the social structure, hierarchy of the subject, ideology, conflict, post-modernist views and the dynamics of the societal change (Levinson, 1981)..
Discourse analysis can be divided into four categories. They are grammatical, sociolinguistic, discourse and strategic competency. Grammatical is the rudimentary factor that is required to form analysis of a subject (Ballmer, & Brennstuhl, 2013). Socio linguistic approach can be defined as the appropriateness of meaning and appropriateness of form. There is at the discourse category cohesion and coherence of the texts. Strategic competence is a mixture of verbal and non-verbal communication (Ballmer, & Brennstuhl, 2013). The experts and the scholars who work on the tradition and conventional ideologies of critical discourse analysis say there is an intricate relationship that exists between the social customs and the linguistics practice of the people. It states that there is an extensive investigation of the impact of societal power through reinforced structure of language
The overall observation that was found from the case study has been documented in this analysis. This situation was a casual discussion between friends and peers. It was not like in an office settings were the people had to use certain terms to elucidate their views. Each individual in the group observed the social linguistic mandates that were relevant to the social context.
In the case study all the participants who had been a part of the conversation ensured that each of their discourse or speech was grammatically sound. The issue of language competency was not there in this situation. Even though that language competence has not been probed n this analysis it has been considered to ensure that the people were grammatically sound. This was a casual conversation among the peers owing to this they followed all the mandatory social conditions and conventions of speech patterns. The people in the conversation were competent and followed all the mandated forms of the socio linguistic and strategic conventions.