加拿大人类学论文代写：冲突的衍生

加拿大人类学论文代写：冲突的衍生

不同方式的概念非常荒谬理论方面触发形成的各种建议的荒谬性及其后果的对抗阶段。根据内格尔的说法，这种荒谬的出现完全是由一个人的意识和内格尔涉及到认识论的怀疑。然而，内格尔显然忽视了人类的形而上学要求插入的宇宙，一个现象被加缪称为方程的荒谬的提示出现的一个必要的组成部分。“正如阿尔贝·加缪所设想的，荒谬主要是一种认识论的断言，指称本体论的要求”（Foley 8）。
另一方面，内格尔似乎忽略了任何人的本体需求的讨论，这是由他的认识论怀疑论的方法破坏，其中复杂的程度，人在不知不觉中寻找饥饿的意义，从死亡的自由和解脱的负担减轻。“这是一个僵化的困境被困在或有过”（贝克尔26），因此，认为防止它进入人的心灵跟着解雇，即使它，硬但具有讽刺意味的事实的概念。通过对模式和遵守危险的存在，内格尔通过他对荒诞的哲学背景的理论方法，它相比，加缪的做法，似乎是一个“精简”版的概念，即“荒诞的生活”。

加拿大人类学论文代写：冲突的衍生

Different manners of conceptualizing the very theoretical aspect of the Absurd triggers the formation of various suggestions about the phase of confrontation of the Absurd and its aftermath. According to Nagel, the emergence of the Absurd is solely triggered by an individual’s conscious mind and Nagel relates it to epistemological skepticism. However, Nagel apparently ignores the metaphysical requirements the humans insert into the universe, a phenomenon regarded by Camus to be a necessary portion of the equation prompting the emergence of the Absurd. “As conceived by Albert Camus, the Absurd is primarily an epistemological assertion referring to an ontological requirement” (Foley 8).
On the other side, Nagel appears to ignore any discussion on the ontological requirement of humans, which is disrupted by his approach to epistemological skepticism, which complicates the extent to which men search for meaning in an unconsciously hungry way, relief from the burden of freedom and deliverance from death. “It is a petrifying dilemma to be stuck in or to have to live with” (Becker 26) and hence, opines to prevent it from entering one’s mind followed by dismissal even if it does, a fact hard but accomplishable with ironic notion. Via a downplaying mode and observance of the existence at stake, Nagel through his theoretical approach to the philosophical context of absurdism, which when compared to Camus’ approach, appears to be a ‘lite’ version of the concept, i.e. ‘absurd lite’.