论文代写：反消费者积极分子
论文代写：反消费者积极分子
这反过来又对公开辩论进行的方式产生了更大的影响。在美国偶像这样的电视节目中，人们并不使用智力论点，而是用人们表达自己的思维过程，并提供私人时间的披露，而这些时间通常是对狭义背景下不寻常经历的讨论（Livingstone，2005）。根据利文斯通的解决方案，防止基于公共领域的规范概念包含公众和参与的各种类型的话语，并理解公民文化作为谈话节目激烈对话的意义。在电视节目中，公众是一个公众辩论参与和导向行动的演员。这些反映的行为模式使人们彼此流畅地移动，以沟通和定位自己。这是公民文化导致放松电视节目中的二元对系统的方式（Livingstone，2005）。从这个角度定义，公众是一个无所不包的东西，因为人们有能力做出诸如“美国偶像”这样的重要类别的区分，其中公众从他们的行为中选出最好的东西，并将其描绘成与观众一样。
论文代写：反消费者积极分子
本节将讨论反消费者积极分子的优先事项，以及他们可以通过反血汗工作者积极分子学到什么，同时确定反血汗工作者积极分子的优先事项以及他们根据罗斯从消费积极分子那里学到的东西。这将通过提供支持的例子来完成（Bair等，2012）。罗斯认为，反消费主义者认为，消费是一种道德方式，而不是一种基本的功能失调的生活方式的掩护，甚至简单地拒绝所有以消费者购买力为基础的民法基础。在界定劳动力问题的时候，往往会出现反消费主义者联合消费减少的现象往往伴随着较少的吸引力。但是，反血汗工厂活动的目的不是为了在全球范围内根除血汗工厂奠定基础，因为这可以通过对当局的有说服力的道德诉求来实现（Klein，2000）。因此，笔者探讨反消费主义者的优先考虑是公平贸易联盟，不仅小企业受益，而且劳动者也应该能够获得最大利益，因为他们根本不支持KuapaKokoo公平交易联盟。 Kuapa如何发展的故事并不隐藏，劳动者个人通过产品产生的活动和深厚的利润而获得了虚拟的支持。
Question 1:
This in turn has larger consequences for the manner in which conduction of public debate takes place. Intellectual arguments are not used in the debate while on the TV show, such as American Idol rather people express their thought processes and provide disclosure of their private times which in general is a discussion of unusual experiences in narrow contexts (Livingstone, 2005). This solution according to Livingstone provides prevention of the public sphere based normative concept from encompassing every type of discourse of public and participation along with understanding the significance of civic culture as a talk show based heated conversation. In TV shows the public is an actor with public debate engagement and oriented actions. These reflect modes of behavior making people fluidly move along each other in order to communicate and orient themselves. This is the way in which civic culture leads towards loosening the binary pair systems such as those present within a TV show (Livingstone, 2005). Defined from this perspective, the public appears as a concept that catches everything without harming because one has the capability of making distinctions of important kind such as in American Idol wherein the public selects the best from their behaviors and portrays the same to the audience.
This section will discuss the anti-consumer activist’s priorities and what they can learn through anti-sweatshop activists along with identifying the priorities of anti-sweatshop activists and what they have gained as learning from consumer activists in accordance to Ross. This will be done by providing examples in support (Bair et al, 2012). According to Ross, anti-consumerists view consumption in ethical manner as something more than a cover shield for fundamental dysfunctional way of life and they even simply reject all politics grounding civil law in the consumer power of purchase. When defining the issues of labor forces, it often happens that anti-consumerists conjunct less consumption often accompanies through working less appeal. However, the mere goal of anti-sweatshop campaigns is not to lay the base for eradicating the sweatshop globally because this could be done through moral appeals of persuasive nature to authorities (Klein, 2000). Therefore, the author probes the priorities of anti-consumerists to be on fair trade alliances wherein not only are small firms benefitted but individuals working a labor should also be able to gain maximum out of the same as they are not supported at all such as the fair trade alliance made by KuapaKokoo. The story behind how Kuapa is grown is not hidden and labor force individuals are humbly supported through the activities and profound profits which the product yields.
