代写论文

论文代写:分析电影“海辛”

论文代写:分析电影“海辛”

从根本上看这取决于电影的方向、电影的剧本。一个关键的评价是如何上主的戒指的电影是由人民。有人发现,大多数人只有积极的评论。当一本书改编成电影很多人不喜欢电影版。人们可能已经被吸引到这部电影的目的,因此,以批判是否电影取得了相同的效果。以类似的方式电影范海辛也是基于德古拉伯爵和怪物已经在许多电影中描绘的。这吸引了观众,也使他们更活跃的观众,因为他们不断比较和作出精神上的说明如何在范海辛的陈述不同于以前的电影。在Barker和马太依斯讨论魔戒的成功的背景下,他们能够发现,电影从根本上成功,他们应该能够刺激观众,娱乐观众,情节应该很强,演员应该是称职的,剧本应该是清晰和事件逻辑。他们应该与观众的关系,要想从根本上主角成功的努力(Bartsch)。观众应该从现实世界中分散注意力,同时观看世界的奇幻世界。所有这些都是在范海辛的情况下,注意到的元素。
这两种理论有许多相似之处,有一定的区别。是观众决定哪部电影观看,从电影中观察到什么。观察因素从一个人到另一个,这是什么改变了为什么电影的推理背后的原因。这就形成了“使用和满足模式”的基本理想,这在本质上解释了为什么一些电影被选择在别人的基础上。使用和满足模型是“被动活动理论”的一部分。另一方面,电影也可以在精神分析的视角分析。

论文代写:分析电影“海辛”

Fundamentally this depends on the direction, screenplay of the movie. A critical evaluation was done as how the Lord of the Rings the movie was received by the people. It was found that the majority of the people had only positive reviews. Whenever a book is adapted into cinema a lot of people do not enjoy the cinematic version. People might have been drawn into the movie for this very purpose, so as to critique whether the movie achieved the same effect as the book. In a similar way the movie Van Helsing is also based on Dracula and the Frankenstein monster that has already been portrayed in many movies. This serves to attract the viewers and also makes them more active audiences as they are constantly comparing and making mental notes on how the representations in Van Helsing differ from previous movies. In the context of Barker and Mathijs discussions on the success of the Lord of the Rings, they were able to find that for a movie to fundamentally successful they should be able to excite the audience, entertain the audience, the plot should be strong, the actors should be competent, the screenplay should be crisp and the events should be logical. They should fundamentally relate with the audience and they should want the main protagonist to succeed in the endeavors (Bartsch). The audience should be distracted from the real world while viewing the fantasy world. All these are also elements noticed in the case of Van Helsing.

There are many similarities and some difference between the two theories. It is the audience who decides which movie to watch and what to observe from the movie. The observation factors vary from an individual to another, and this is what changes the reasoning behind why the movie is watched. This forms the basic ideal for the ‘Use and Gratification model’ which is in essence explains why some movies are selected over others. The Uses and Gratification model is part of ‘Passive to Active Theory’. On the other hand, movies can also be analyzed in a psychoanalytic perspective.