論文代寫價格：假釋罪犯犯罪的案例
論文代寫價格：假釋罪犯犯罪的案例
對假釋罪犯犯罪的報導越來越多，媒體也進行了大量報導。艾德里安·貝利(Adrian Bayley)就是這樣一個例子，他在假釋期間謀殺了吉爾·米格爾(Jill Meagher)，引發了公眾的憤怒。憤怒在於要求對假釋罪犯的管理進行嚴肅審查，並重複犯罪。米格爾參加完一個晚會，深夜回家，她決定走到離家很近的地方，這時貝利來了，殺死了她，埋了她的屍體。米格爾的丈夫在接到80個無人接聽的電話後前來尋找，發現她的妻子已經死亡。另一起類似案件是2012年史蒂文·詹姆斯·亨特(Steven James Hunter)殘忍殺害薩拉·卡弗基(Sarah Cafferkey)的案件，當時卡弗基剛剛獲得假釋。本文就如何保障假釋罪犯服刑期滿後的逐步康復，同時保護社會和個人的尊嚴，使其免受假釋承辦人的屢犯之害進行探討。將案例研究作為人類尊嚴問題的主要原因是否認自己所作的承諾以及否認受害者吉爾和薩拉的生命權。
論文代寫價格：假釋罪犯犯罪的案例
吉爾和薩拉有著與生俱來的人類價值，他們應該活到生命的盡頭，這本身就是一個人類尊嚴的問題。任何人都不允許通過剝奪自己的生存權來縮短自己的生命，而罪犯即使在以非罪犯的身份犯罪之後也會這樣做。假釋條件是對罪犯言詞的遵守和遵守的具體條件。這兩名罪犯沒有遵守，其中一名正在假釋期間殺人。這使問題升級為傷害人類尊嚴的問題。視角1——罪犯假釋後進入社會危害社會，是對人格尊嚴的破壞。罪犯的不道德行為必須得到充分的懲罰，國家的責任是保護公民的尊嚴和生存的權利不被剝奪。透視2 -假釋的意思是，並被認為是提高罪犯的尊嚴，當他被允許在社會監督的條件下。假釋的主要目的是為了給罪犯注入自我價值和尊嚴，從而減少再次犯罪的機會。
論文代寫價格：假釋罪犯犯罪的案例
There has been an increase and massive media coverage of crims conducted by convicted criminals who are on parole. One such case is that of Adrian Bayley who, while on parole, murdered Jill Meagher that sparked a public outrage. The outrage was about demanding a serious review of the governance of convicted criminals on parole and repeating an offense. Meagher was returning from a party late night and in her decision to walk down her close-by home, she was accosted by Bayley who killed her and buried her dead body. Meagher’s husband came searching after 80 unanswered calls and found her wife dead. Another such case is the brutal murder of Sarah Cafferkey by Steven James Hunter in 2012 a few days after his parole had expired. This essay will discuss the issue of safeguarding the gradual rehabilitation of criminals serving a parole after finishing their sentence in prison, and at the same time protecting the dignity of the society and individuals to be saved from repeat offense by the parole undertakers. The primary reason for taking the case study as an issue of human dignity is the denial of one’s own commitment given and denial of the right to life of the victims, Jill and Sarah.
論文代寫價格：假釋罪犯犯罪的案例
Jill and Sarah having an inherent human value deserve to live to the end of their time, which itself is a human dignity issue. No one is allowed to cut short their life by denying their right to live, which the criminals did even after committing for being a non-offender. The condition of a parole is given on the word of the criminal to observe and obey specific conditions. This was not obeyed by the two criminals, and one of them was serving his parole while murdering. This escalated the issue to be an issue of hurting human dignity. Perspective 1 –Criminals when released in society on parole endangers the society and are threats to demolishing of human dignity. Criminals who conduct immoral actions must be adequately punished, and it is the duty of the State to protect the citizens from being ripped of their dignity and a right to live. Perspective 2 – Parole is meant and believed to be enhancing the dignity of the offender when he is allowed to be in society on a supervised condition. Rehabilitation being the main focus of parole is believed to infuse in the offender, some sense of self-worth and dignity thereby reducing the chance of reoffending.
