美国圣路易斯论文代写 :双方协议

美国圣路易斯论文代写 :双方协议

考虑事项是交易双方之间的事宜,不能被视为任何密封协议的先决条件。它涉及道德问题,如果双方达成协议,不对其宣布的协议进行任何考虑,法律必须将其视为个人决定。但是,有一方当事方根据可能不准备或可能伪造的事实签署协议。在这种情况下,这些陈述成为协议的救星,没有任何考虑。
另一个需要考虑的情况是支付所有的债务。啤酒在1875年因欠债和成本获得了债务判决。一年之后,他们签署了一项协议,即债券将支付部分债务,其余的将分期支付。由于啤酒不会对判决进行诉讼,所以付款部分债务已经支付了,但是啤酒确实采取了这样的处理,所以1882年的判决收回了所支付债务的利息。然而,确定全债已经得到回报。在这种情况下,啤酒可以从付款中收回利息,因为法庭表示,在付款当天支付较少的款项不是债务人很好的考虑因素,而债权人有希望收回债务伴随着兴趣。如此看来,如果在每种情况下没有适当地界定这种考虑,可能会导致严重的问题,从而耗费参与者的时间,金钱和精力。如果提到了承诺的考虑,没有提到部分付款的利息支付,那么可能会导致双方的问题。很多时候,这种考虑被认为是一种道德责任,预计来自作为提供者的当事方之一。

美国圣路易斯论文代写 :双方协议

Consideration is a matter between the transacting parties and must not be seen as a pre-requisite for any agreements being sealed. It relates to a moral issue if two parties enter into an agreement which does not contain any consideration for their declared agreement, and law must accept it as a personal decision. However, there are cases when one of the parties enters an agreement based on facts which may be ill-prepared or may be forged. In such cases, such statements become a saviour for the agreements without any considerations.
Another case for consideration was for payment of debt owned. Beer obtained a judgement against Foakes for a debt that was owed and costs in 1875.After a year, they entered into an agreement that Foakes would pay part consideration of debt and the rest would be paid in instalments. Foakes paid the part debt under the consideration that Beer would not take proceedings on judgement, but Beer did take proceeding so the judgement in 1882 to recover the interest over the debt paid. However it was established that the whole debt had now been paid off. In this case, Beer could recover the interest payment from Foakes, because the court said that a lesser payment on the day of payment is not a good consideration on the part of the debtor, and it is good for the creditors promise to recover the dent along with interest. Thus seen, that consideration if not properly defined in each case, it could lead to severe issues that drain the time, money and energy of those involved. If consideration of a promise is mentioned and the interest payment on part payment is not mentioned, then it could lead to problems for the parties. Many a times the consideration is taken to be a moral responsibility and it is expected from one of the parties who are the providers.