美国图尔萨论文代写：消费者信任分析
美国图尔萨论文代写：消费者信任分析
平均值的差异是- 0.557，从数学上来说，AGL得到的响应的均值比单纯能量得到的响应的平均值要低。上述测试所得到的t统计量为- 4.184，而从t表中得到的t统计量的相应临界值为2.617到2.576之间。比较的结果总是与t统计量的绝对值(4.184)作比较。显然，得到的测试统计量超过临界值。因此，零假设被拒绝。这意味着这两种方法不相等。由于这两种方法在数学上不相等，所以可以说，简单的能量比AGL更有意义。
意见和建议
因此，从上述讨论，可以得出两个响应集的均值不相等的结论。很明显，简单能量的平均值更高。这意味着消费者比AGL更喜欢能源。更有可能的是，随机选择的人更喜欢与简单的能量联系，而不是与AGL。这背后的原因仅仅是，与后者相比，客户对前者有更强的信任。因此，假设消费者对简单的能源有更高的信任度，就会倾向于适应公司新的月支付计划，那么就可以有把握地得出这样的结论，即简单的能源所带来的新能源计划将被广泛接受。
考虑到这一点，在公司的信任和可靠性不断增强的机会中，简单地使用能源是明智的。使用消费者推荐和口碑营销策略等，简单的精力应该集中于抓住市场，确保目标细分市场更大。与AGL竞争并不是一件容易的事情，因为自19世纪后期以来，他们在市场上有一个非常陡峭的学习曲线。然而，仅仅是精力就有了年轻人的热情和创新，消费者的可靠性也在不断提高。如果该公司采取适当的措施，它可以很容易地在市场上扩张，以更有效地与像AGL这样的巨头竞争。
美国图尔萨论文代写：消费者信任分析
The difference in the mean is -0.557 meaning that mathematically, the mean of the responses obtained for AGL is lower than the mean of the responses obtained for Simply Energy. The t-statistic obtained for the above test is -4.184 whereas the corresponding critical value of the t-statistic obtained from the t-table at 1% level of significance is somewhere between 2.617 and 2.576. The comparison is always made with the absolute value of the t-statistic i.e. 4.184. Clearly, the obtained test statistic exceeds the critical value. Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected. It implies that the two means are not equal. Since the two means are not equal, mathematically, it can be said that Simply Energy has a higher mean than AGL.
Suggestions and Recommendations
Thus, from the above discussion, it can be concluded that the mean of the two response sets are not equal. Clearly, the mean of Simply Energy is higher. It implies that that consumer prefer Simply Energy more than AGL. It is more likely that a person picked at random will prefer to get associated with Simply Energy than with AGL. The reason behind this will simply be the fact that the customers have a stronger trust on the former as compared to the latter. So, assuming that customers with higher trust on Simply Energy will prefer to adapt with the new monthly payment of plan of the firm, it can be safely concluded that the new energy plan taken out by Simply Energy will be widely accepted.
With this in mind, it will be advisable for Simply Energy to cash-in on the opportunity of growing trust and reliability on the firm. Using consumer referral and word of mouth marketing strategies among others, Simply Energy should focus on grabbing the market and ensuring a bigger presence in the target segment. Competing with AGL is not going to be an easy task because they have a very steep learning curve due to their existence in the market since the late nineteenth century. However, Simply Energy has the zeal and the innovation of the youth with growing consumer reliability. If the firm takes proper steps, it can very easily expand in the market to compete more efficiently with a giant like AGL.
