swot analysis 代写：家族企业数据库

swot analysis 代写：家族企业数据库

用于收集数据的调查方法载于附录。该报告使用了一份53个项目的调查表，分发给1700家家族企业。公司的首席执行官完成了测试，总体反应率为12%。详细介绍了公司的成立年代、营业额形式、法律结构等。根据模块1，回答问卷被认为是研究中最普遍持有的外行人信念。研究过程通常会携带关于问卷设计和开发的数据。问卷可用于探索性研究设计、描述性研究和因果或实验研究,但它们是有区别的目的使用它们(模块4)。他们是最常用的技术和管理,通过邮件,传真,或通过互联网,等等。在探索性研究中，问卷可能更开放，而在描述性研究中，问卷的形式是针对更大的样本和更封闭的问题。在因果设计中，问卷被用来测量参与者的态度。用于收集数据的方法没有得到充分的描述。介绍了问卷的形式和发放方式。但是，并没有提出实际的问题。在家庭小组报告中也没有提出在他们的研究范围内使用调查表方法的理由。1700个样本只包括毕马威澳大利亚和澳大利亚家族企业数据库中列出的家族企业。
使用的抽样策略没有明确指出。它没有详细描述。参与者是从现有的列表中选择的，因此可以说这是一种方便或有目的的抽样。这些公司中最资深的员工通常是公司的首席执行官，他们是此次调查的调查对象。抽样策略必须被充分描述，以使一个人了解如何选择参与者。在描述抽样时最常见的一些问题是可能被忽略的细节。对样本大小的描述将通过不描述可能给出的抽样技术来给出。有时，研究人员可能只是给出非常一般的抽样理由，可能无法将其与他们的研究联系起来(模块3)。抽样将基于研究方法的形式。判断性抽样或有目的抽样可用于案例研究。在采样中，需要提到采样元素和覆盖的地理区域(模块8)，需要定义一个典型的采样框架。被调查者选择的抽样策略缺乏细节。除样本量外，没有提及抽样技术、技术论证等。给出了样本的地理覆盖面积。没有定义典型的采样帧。这里必须提供更多关于抽样和证明该技术的细节。

swot analysis 代写：家族企业数据库

The survey method used to collect the data is presented in the appendices. The report has made use of a fifty-three item questionnaire, distributed to 1,700 family businesses. The CEO of companies completed it and the overall response rate was 12 percent. The age of firm, form of turnover, legal structure and more are presented in detail.According to module 1, answering questionnaire is considered as the most commonly held layman belief in research. The research process will usually carry data on how the questionnaire is designed and developed. Questionnaires can be used for exploratory research design, descriptive research and causal or experiment research, but they are differentiated in what purpose they are used for (Module 4). They are the most commonly used technique and are administered face to face, by mail, by fax, or by the internet, etc. Questionnaire might be more open ended in exploratory research whereas in descriptive research, the questionnaire form is aimed at larger samples and more closed ended questions. In causal designs, the questionnaires are used to measure participants’ attitude.The methods used to collect data are not adequately described. The forms of questionnaire and sending questionnaire are described. However, the actual questions are not presented. A justification for using the questionnaire method in the context of their research was also not presented in the Family Group report. The sample of 1700 includes only the family businesses that were listed on KPMG Australia’s and Family Business Australia’s databased.
The sampling strategy used is not pointed out clearly. It is not described in detail. Participants were selected from an existing list and therefore it could be said that this is a form of convenience or purposive sampling. The most senior employees of the firms, who are typically the CEO of the company, are the respondents selected for the survey. The sampling strategy has to be described adequately for a person to understand how participants are selected. Some of the most common problems noted in describing sampling are the details that might be left out. Deatails on the sample size would be given by not description of the sampling technique that might be given. Sometimes, researchers might just give very generic justifications for sampling and might fail to connect it to their research (Module 3). The sampling will be based on the form of research approach. The judgmental or the purposeful sampling might be used with case studies. In sampling, it is necessary to mention the sampling elements and the geographic area of coverage (Module 8). A typical sampling frame has to be defined.Sampling strategy for respondent selection is lacking in terms of details. Except for the sample size, there is no mention of sampling technique, justification of technique, etc. Sample geographic coverage area is given. A typical sampling frame is not defined. More details on sampling and justification for the technique must have been presented here.