How is truth related to science? In an ideal way, being a prelude to answer this particular question, we must start by the specification of what truth is basically referred to as. However, in an unfortunate manner, though a number of philosophers related to science believe in the fact that the concept related to truth is relevant for considering to practice and results related to scientific work. There does not seem to be any consensus with respect to what concept of truth, between a numbers of philosophers have been established in a better general manner (Leeds, 2007).
As I suspect, almost everyone would consider agreeing to the fact that the scientific facts are within the business for the production of knowledge, scientific work contributes in producing explanations, predictions, models and theories that has been offered in a significant manner. This is known to be the prima facie considering candidates with respect to knowledge and the work of science ends up producing explanations, predictions, models and theories, one significant need for being a realist, however, for adopting a positive attitude with respect to the connection between truth and science (Piccinini, 2007). A specific level of pessimism in consideration with truth seems to be holding compatibility with a significant level of optimism. One might end up questioning the truths being produced by sciences at all, or that while this might be done on some occasions, there is less reasoning for thinking that they are specifically successful with respect to this. On daily basis, scepticism regarding the veracity related to scientific knowledge is known to be having its source within the scope of multiplicity related to motivations (Leeds, 2007). This is with respect to the epistemological towards the political, social and religious aspect. In consideration with the philosophy of science, it can be stated that these views are known to be having relevant political and social dimensions.