写手招聘：流行文化

写手招聘：流行文化

他给出的定义层的一些文本是:流行文化是文化,被很多人喜欢。流行文化也可以遗留下来的文化,这是脱离“高雅文化”。文化,不如其他文化。流行文化也是文化,目的是向大批观众。这个定义也表明thatpopular文化本质上是商业的本质。而高雅文化是“创造”的个别行为的结果(p。6)流行文化是什么,这是通过形成“人”而不是强加的精英。层解释说,根据马克思的论点“每个重要时期在历史上是围绕一个特定的“生产方式”:也就是说,在一个社会组织(即奴隶、封建、资本主义)生产生活必需品——食物、住所、等”(59页)。这个理论非常相关的文化。

写手招聘：流行文化
文化在任何时期都受到不同的元素,它负责生产(威廉姆斯,1991)。弗洛伊德精神分析的研究还提供了一个不同的角度对文化。他的定义解释说,“他精神分裂成两个主要部分——有意识的组件,直接与世界上交易,和处理本能驱使的无意识和压抑的愿望”(p . 91)。层的研究指出,当前世界是由资本主义。“我们正在积极参与文化”(p . 234)。根据马克思主义时代的设置,需要一些注意力转向“文本化,细节的生产和消费”为了未来的布局文化研究(p。235)。为进一步发现在文化、也很重要,以避免“反智主义”和“dismissivelitism”(235页)。

写手招聘：流行文化

Some of the definitions given by Storey in his text are:Popular culture is the culture, which is liked by many people.Popular culture could also be the left over culture, which is separated from ‘high culture’. Culture, which is inferior to other culture.Popular culture is also the culture, which is aimed towards mass audiences. This definition also suggests thatpopular culture is intrinsically commercial by nature. Whereas high culture is “the result of an individual act of creation” (p. 6)Popular culture is something, which is formed through the ‘people’ rather than being imposed by the elites.Storey explains that according to the Marx argument “each significant period in history is constructed around a particular ‘mode of production’: that is, the way in which a society is organized (i.e. slave, feudal, capitalist) to produce the necessaries of life – food, shelter, etc” (p. 59). This theory is quite relevant in the case of Culture.

写手招聘：流行文化
Culture in any period is influenced by different elements, which are responsible for producing it (Williams, 1991). The Freudian study of psychoanalysis also provides a different perspective towards culture. His definition explains that “he mind splits into two main parts – the conscious component that deals directly with the world, and the unconscious that handles instinctual drives and repressed wishes” (p. 91). The studies of Storey states that, the current world is dominated by capitalism. “we are the active participants in culture” (p. 234). According to the post-Marxist setting, some attention is required towards “details of production, textuality, and consumption” in order to have the future layout of the cultural studies (p. 235). For further discovery in culture, it is also important to avoid “anti-intellectualism” and “dismissivelitism” (p. 235).