新西兰论文代写：巴黎恐怖袭击
新西兰论文代写：巴黎恐怖袭击
在本文中，我们将对巴黎恐怖袭击的主题——记忆、奇观和权力——以及这些主题之间如何以及是否存在关联进行分析。它可以被认为是一个有两种方式的过程，用骚乱作为一种来源来探索主题，就像用主题来讨论暴乱一样。与此相关的关键推理是，如果将记忆、奇观和权力视为常态化的过程，那么就会有一种不正常的事件发生，其中就有与主题相关的有效性度量(d’ancona 2013)。在这个例子中，我们认为归一化的过程是，这些因素往往共同作用于维持现状，这一点在本文的其他部分将会注意到。这篇文章的关键假设是，通过考虑这些因素如何做出关键的贡献，以及如何控制骚乱，而不考虑不同的工作方式，因为它们最终创造了一个由社会所经历的过程。这是由权力驱动的，在奇观的控制下，最终是记忆的延续。首先，重要的是要知道袭击是什么。在最初的场景中，2015年11月的巴黎恐怖袭击是由恐怖分子策划的一系列精心策划的袭击，这些恐怖分子与巴黎北郊的圣德尼(Saint- Denis)一起在巴黎发动袭击。
新西兰论文代写：巴黎恐怖袭击
在2015年11月13日,有一个引人注目的三个自杀式炸弹袭击者从一句话CET(中央东部东京)开始,在圣丹尼斯,在法兰西大球场,紧随其后的是大规模枪击和自杀式炸弹袭击在音乐场所,餐厅和咖啡馆在巴黎的中心部分(勇和贝尔,2015)。攻击者最终杀死130人,其中包括89人在巴塔克莱恩剧院劫持人质与警察在订婚之前站——。它已经看到社会问题产生重大影响的青年,不平等,失业率和教育提供这些人的借口。抢劫训练员和电视可能不能被认为是对社会不公正的合理反应，但是，在这种情况下，在开始行动时可以认为是愤怒，而不是在它所做的事情的背景下。对不公平的权威的怨恨是对过去巴黎恐怖主义行为的驱动。从19世纪的爆炸事件，到20世纪的枪击事件，再到2010年以来的爆炸、枪击、刺杀、车辆撞击等事件，这些事件在历史上都很突出。这就确定了这篇文章要讨论的第一个因素，因为很明显，这些历史事件以及巴黎恐怖袭击都是由使用权力的机构发起的行动引发的(Norton和Thompson, 2015)。
新西兰论文代写：巴黎恐怖袭击
In this essay, an analysis will be conducted for Paris Attacks with respect to the themes of memory, spectacle, and power along with how and if these themes have a link with one another. It can be considered as a process of two ways, with the riots utilized as a source to explore the themes as much as there is use of themes for the discussion of riots. The key reasoning related to this is that if one looks at memory, spectacle and power as the processes of normalization, there is acting of riots being an abnormal decidedly event in terms of which there is measurement of effectiveness related to the themes (d’Ancona 2013). In this instance, what is considered as the process of normalization is that these factors tend to act together for the maintenance of status quo, as it will be noticed in other parts of the essay. The key hypothesis set for this essay is that by considering how the factors make key contribution and have control over the riots, irrespective of working in a number of different ways, as they end up creating a process that is experienced by the societies. This is driven in terms of power, under the control of spectacle, and finally the perpetuation of memory.To begin with the discussion, it is important to know as what the attacks were. In the initial setting, the Paris Attacks of November 2015, were a number of well- coordinated attacks by terrorists that took place in Paris along with Saint- Denis that is its northern suburb.
新西兰论文代写：巴黎恐怖袭击
In the year 2015 on 13th November, there was a striking of three suicide bombers starting from 21:20 CET, in Saint Denis, near the Stade de France, followed by mass shootings and suicide bombings at a music venue, restaurants and cafes in the central part of Paris (Yong and Bale, 2015). The attackers ended up killing 130 individuals that included 89 individuals taking hostages at the Bataclan theatre prior to having an engagement with the police in a stand- off. It has been seen that social issues have a significant impact on youth, in terms of inequality, unemployment and education being offered as an excuse to these individuals. Looting trainers and TVs might not be identified as a logical response to unfairness of the society, however, it can be considered as anger in the initiation of action significant in this context, and not in context with what has been done by it. Resentment for authority of unfairness is to keep with the drivers for past acts of terrorism in Paris. These have been prominent all across history from bombings in the years of 1800s, and the shootings of the years of 1900s, and recent incidents of bombing, shooting, stabbing, vehicle ramming and others since the year 2010. This results in identifying the first factor that this essay will address, as it appears to be obvious that these historical instances along with the terrorist attacks in Paris had been triggered by the actions initiated by institution with the use of power (Norton and Thompson, 2015).
