英国毕业论文格式：研究自我的特征
英国毕业论文格式：研究自我的特征
现在过去的研究论文提出自我的特征从很多不同的方面,如自我将如何影响个人的幸福感,这些问题对神经质、身体意识,身体羞辱等等。消极情绪影响结果的人将self-objectify。现在根据大多数研究员到自我客观化所存在的负面效果,参数,提出自我将导致更多的机会的人感到耻辱会身体比正常。羞愧的情绪导致个体社会标准的规范化,这是一种道德情感。个人会觉得这种情绪在这种情况下,他们相信他们已经在某些方面未能达到预计一些社会标准。失败的社会标准可能是也可能不是真实的东西。
英国毕业论文格式：研究自我的特征
现在在当前自我的基础,论证了女性的理想是媒体在当代世界中给出的预测是非常不现实的。女性会无法满足这些标准在现实的方式,这对他们来说,是不可能不被身体羞辱如果他们对这些媒体的标准要求。研究由诺尔和弗雷德里克森(1998)调查格式建立了204多名妇女,性格自我报告将直接影响身体的耻辱,相关性研究中指出来自29 .51和范围的麦金利和海德(1996),相关性指出29和.51的范围。在这项研究中,大约360名女性进行了研究。这里大约有155相关性指出。
英国毕业论文格式：研究自我的特征
Now past research papers have presented the traits of Self-Objectification from many different aspects such as how the Self-Objectification will have an impact on the well-being of the individual, the issues with respect to neuroticism, body consciousness, body shaming and more. Negative emotional consequences results for the person who would self-objectify. Now according to most researcher arguments on the negative effects of Self-Objectification, it is proposed that Self-Objectification would result in more opportunities for the person to feel shame about one’d body than they would normally. Shame is the emotion that results in the normalization of individuals to societal standards, it is as such a moral emotion. Individuals would feel this emotion in such instances where they believe they have in some way failed to live up to some societal standard as is expected from them. The failure in societal standard may or may not be a real thing.
英国毕业论文格式：研究自我的特征
Now in the current basis of Self-Objectification, the arguments made are that women’s ideals that are presented in media in contemporary world projections are very unrealistic. Women would not be able to meet these standards in a realistic way, and it would be impossible for them not to be body shamed if they were to hold these media standards as requirements. Research studies conducted by Noll and Fredrickson (1998) on a survey format with more than 204 women established that trait self-objectification would directly have an impact on their reports of body shame, the correlations noted in the study were from the range of .29 to .51 and in the case of the work of McKinley and Hyde (1996), the correlations noted were in the range of .29 and .51. In this study, around 360 women were studied. There were about 155 correlations noted here.
