在这个特定的文章中，Callister描述了Robin Boyd随着澳大利亚几个建筑按时间顺序。这本书开始于Robin Boyd写的一本书，书中提出了这样一个事实：每一位艺术家都以其灵感的形式在澳大利亚的任何地方、任何地方、任何地方到处一瞥。在1951年，类似的识别提出了澳大利亚的建筑，而绝望的情绪一直是他在为澳大利亚国家的最后一本书（Callister 1992）。在这一背景下，本文作者展示了这两种情绪的辩证关系，即博伊德的失望和欲望。
In this particular article, Callister had described Robin Boyd along with several architecture of Australia as per their chronological order. It started with a book written by Robin Boyd that places arguments regarding the fact that each and every artist was having a glance everywhere and anywhere but within the borders of Australia in the form of their inspiration. By the year 1951, similar recognition had been pointed out for the architecture of Australia, while despair emotions had been emanated by him in his final book for the nation of Australia (Callister 1992). In this context, the author of this article has shown dialectic relationship of these two emotions that are the disappointment and desire of Boyd.
It has been stated within this particular article that from the time when the second book had been written by Boyd, he might have been considering image of region with the strong reference in local context as the way in which the architects of Australia could focus on the identification of an expression in the best possible manner related to the culture of Australia. The author identified that Boyd had been praising the houses that had been built in the years of 1940s on the range of peninsula (Callister 1992). However, there can be no dissociation in his interest within the peninsula from the global trends in the field of architecture.
As per the point of view of this particular article, there had been clear optimization of the statements given and actions performed by Boyd for the global recognition of the architecture of Australia. However, the arguments that have been placed seem to be contradicting when there had been polarization of a number of architects amongst the organic and the functional aspects within the field of architecture. There had been a close relation in the international debates that focused on the concepts of architecture (Callister 1992). According to Boyd, the concepts related to internationalism and nationalism seem to be tussling with the new international. Considering this particular article, it can be stated that no question can be imposed over the position held by Boyd as a critic and writer or the way he had influenced the architects of Australia, the ability and knowledge of Boyd can be easily recognized.