英国代写论文:SST理论

英国代写论文:SST理论

SST理论包括各种技术手段作为证明其合理性的证据。在这篇文章中,有两个用于证明SST理论价值的工件 – 计算机和智能手机。通过分析自行车的发展,可以更好地了解SST。

英国代写论文:SST理论

在Pitch和Bijker(1984)的研究中,已经强调了“Penny Farthing”自行车模型(Pinch&Bijker,1987)。这项研究决定了这种模式如何影响社会的不同群体,并通过改变观念导致新模式的发展。 Penny Farthing的自行车模型是在维多利亚时代建造的,与今天使用的新款自行车相比,曾被认为是无用的。这种模式的用户是冒险的年轻人,他们认为自行车是冒险运动的媒介,而不是简单的交通方式。这个模型的非用户被定义为另一组,因为他们认为自行车是一种交通工具而不是冒险运动。因此,该技术涉及两个相关群体 – 用户(冒险的年轻人)和非用户(老年人和女性相信这项技术是不安全和危险的)。这种认知差异被定义为解释性的灵活性。自行车的优越技术开始消失,因为社会力量将其视为更加危险和不合理的人造物,加强。由于社会对于可靠和更安全的技术创新的支配,普尼菲森模型因此结束了建造普通自行车的使用,直到目前为止。这证明了SST模型的重要性,即社会选择在塑造技术方面至关重要,它是社会问题的解决方案(Pinch&Bijker,1987)。

英国代写论文:SST理论

SST theory includes various technological artefacts as evidence to prove it rational. In this essay, two such artefacts used to prove the worthiness of SST theory are- Computers and Smartphones. A better understanding of SST can be achieved by analysing the development of Bicycles.

英国代写论文:SST理论

In the research by Pitch and Bijker (1984), the “Penny Farthing” model of bicycle has been emphasized (Pinch & Bijker, 1987). This study determines how this model affects different groups of the society and leads to development of a new model by changing perceptions. The Penny Farthing model of bicycles was constructed in the Victorian Era and used to be considered useless when compared to new bicycle models used today. The users of this model were adventurous, young people who considered bicycle as a medium of adventure sports rather than as simple mode of transportation. The non-users of this model were defined as the other group as they considered bicycle as a mode of transportation and not adventure sport. Thus, the technology involved two relevant groups – users (adventurous young people) and non-users (elderly people and females who believed this technology to be unsafe and dangerous). This difference in perception is defined as interpretative flexibility. The superior technology of bicycle began fading away as social forces perceiving it as more dangerous and non-sensible artefact, strengthened. Penny Farthing model thus ended with the construction of an ordinary bicycle, being used till date, due to the dominance of society towards a reliable and safer technological innovation. This proves the significance of SST model that social choices are crucial in shaping technology and it is the solution to social problems (Pinch & Bijker, 1987).