硕士论文代写

英国代写:印度经济增长阻碍的因素

英国代写:印度经济增长阻碍的因素。实证分析表明,对于印度来说,排放是经济增长的阻碍因素,但其他因素在统计上并不显著,因为印度尚未达到发展的门槛水平,这些因素在提高生产率方面发挥更大的作用。另一方面,加拿大与预测者的关系非常不同。人均GDP是生产力的一个强有力的预测指标,排放也是如此。此外,它还受到数据可用性的限制。有更多的变数、更多的国家和更长的时期的深入分析将更深入地了解这些国家的劳动生产率和经济增长的决定因素和阻碍因素。接下来英国代写专家将对印度经济增长阻碍的因素进行以下分析与讨论。

印度的上述模型表明,无论是政府在教育上的支出,还是人均GDP,在统计上都不显著。根据文献综述,这意味着印度的教育水平仍然很低,远低于门槛。因此,尽管有政府开支,劳动力仍然普遍未受教育或文盲。换句话说,劳动力没有意识到教育的重要性,或者在短期内无法从教育中获得好处。这就是为什么这个模型没有显示出政府在教育上的支出与经济增长之间有任何统计上的显著关系。同样,印度还没有达到人均GDP的门槛,因为它与经济增长的关系并不显著。排放系数的符号为负,这与预期一致。

另一方面,加拿大的模型提供了非常不同的结果。而在印度的情况下,人均GDP的对数平方并没有显示出对模型的任何显著贡献,去除它实际上增加了模型的调整R2,在加拿大的情况下正好相反。平方项的加入实际上显著增加了模型的解释能力。人均GDP的系数为正,而其平方项的系数为负。这是有文献支持的。然而,在加拿大的模型中,排放具有正且显著的系数。这是因为加拿大的经济增长与其二氧化碳排放量之间的相关性在统计上并不是零。然而,中国的排放量相当低,比印度低得多。因此,这个国家的人民对该国排放的小幅激增有了更强的容忍度。另外,加拿大增加排放的边际成本远低于印度。这就是为什么印度模型的排放系数是负的,而加拿大模型的排放系数是负的。

The empirical analysis shows that the for India emissions is a deterrent of economic growth but other factors are not statistically significant because India has not yet reached the threshold level of development where these factors play a bigger role in increasing productivity. Canada on the other hand shows a very different relationship with the predictors. Per capita GDP is a strong predictor of productivity and so is emission.

The above analysis is limited in its focus because it uses two countries only. Furthermore it is limited by data availability. An in-depth analysis with more variables, more countries and longer periods will give a deeper insight into the determinants and inhibitors of labour productivity and economic growth in the countries.The above model of India shows that neither government’s spending on education nor per capita GDP is statistically significant. Based on literature review, it implies that level of education in India is still very low, well below the threshold. As a result, despite government spending, the labour force remains widely uneducated or illiterate. In other words, the labour force does not realise the importance of education or is unable to derive benefits from education in the short run. This is why the model does not show any statistically significant relation between government spending on education and economic growth. Similarly, the threshold of per capita GDP is not yet reached for India because of which its relation with economic growth is not significant. The sign of emissions coefficient is negative which is as expected.

The model of Canada on the other hand offers very different results. While in the case of India, the square of log of per capita GDP did not show any significant contribution to the model and its removal actually increased the adjusted R2 of the model, in case of Canada it was exactly opposite. The addition of the squared term actually increased the explanatory power of the model significantly. GDP per capita has positive coefficient while its square term has negative coefficient. This is supported by literature. However, emission has a positive & significant coefficient in the model for Canada. This is because the correlation between the economic growth of Canada and its CO2 emissions is not statistically different from zero. However, the emissions in the country are quite low, much lower than India. As a result the people of the country have a stronger tolerance for small surge in the emissions of the country. Alternatively, the marginal cost of increased emissions in Canada is much lower than that of India. This is why the emissions coefficient of Indian model is negative while that of Canada is negative.

以上内容就是英国代写专家对印度经济增长阻碍因素的分析与讨论。如果同学们没有足够的时间来完成英语论文与作业,论文代写推荐留学生选择英国论文代写Advancedthesis服务。因为其服务公司的论文创作专家团队由高素质和经验丰富的学术作家组成,保障论文创作质量且与合理的论文代写价格。除此之外,还为留学生提供essay代写、毕业论文代写、硕士论文代写等服务,从而让留学生们轻松应对论文写作并创作出专属个人的优秀论文!