My team members approach to leadership were different from my approach. They focused on the aspects of building relationships. They were more concerned about how to bring the stakeholders together. I wanted a specific plan to ensure that each member had the appropriate guidelines for the creation of a sustainable plan. My team members wanted a plan that was about asking the people to innovate. I wanted to profess that not all the people in a company can be tech savvy. Owing to this, there was a confusion and conflict (Bass & Riggio, 2006). I then tried to be a good follower. I believe that being a good follower is needed for a good leader. We tried to give positive opinions about one another and worked our way through the conflict. From this, we tried to collate a plan that was about fostering relationship and having some specifics. The importance of fostering connection was developed in the process. On reflection, I think it is important to invest in people and focus on some specifics. While it is important to have technical knowledge, it is important to lead people towards the right direction.
I have to admit in this from critical self-evaluation, I wanted to be a leader to help my grades. This is a fiduciary calling. The misconception that I had was that the leader develops the plan. However, this was silly assumptions (Drath, 2001). I comprehended from interaction that all the members were valuable for the creation of output. The individual glory or satisfaction is derived from the sentiments of the complete group. I comprehended that a leader is not a social position or a formal position. I understood that in the future, I needed to understand that the act of leading people is based on followership and respect that the people have for one another. I understood that each role that a person plays is a form of leadership. It was observed that guidance that the people do to one another that leads them for the fulfilment of the objectives.