英国论文代写：经济纠纷案件
英国论文代写：经济纠纷案件
1.先例是什么意思？
先例是先前的决定应该被理解。这偶尔会引导不公平的决定，在讨论义务先例的优点和缺点的时候，案件将会处理。先例是在案件事实相似的情况下，在将来的情况下，法官的判决先例如何。以前法官总结了法律标准;在今后合法的情况下，需要采取同样的关切或事实。这也是从普通法或判例法确定的，这是从先例到先例形成的。
2.阐明凝视的含义和应用。
先例依赖于凝视决定的守则，更一般地与“凝视决定”有关，表示为“由决定的问题所在”。
3.访问以下网站http://www.austlii.edu.au/并找到这种情况：简要说明您是如何发现的
我打开网站并写下案件名称，然后自动出现Mildura Office Equipment＆Supplies Pty Ltd v Canon Finance Australia Ltd [2006] VSC 42（2006年2月16日）的案件（现命名为Mildura）。
米尔迪拉案涉及单边合同的含义，界定单边合同。
这是一个协议，只有一方缔造一个明确的承诺，或开始一个没有初步确保相互符合的表示。单方面合同是否是被告在经销商会议上的幽默表现是否是合同提案，之后是通过采购原告经济商业原告而成立的，有利于被告人的交易也是模糊的，不确定反映是否规定了对现有经销商的优势的可及性。
英国论文代写：经济纠纷案件
1. What is meant by a precedent case?
The precedent case is where preceding decisions should be perused. This can occasionally direct to unfair decisions, which the case will tackle when discussing about the merits and demerits of obligatory precedent. Precedent case is the way, where precedent decisions of judges are perused in the cases of future when the facts of the cases are similar. Formerly a judge concludes a legal standard; it is needed that is employed in future lawful cases with parallel concerns or facts. This is as well identified as common law or case law which has formed by expansion down from precedent to precedent.
2.Explain the meaning and application of stare decisis.
Precedent is depended upon the code of stare decisis, more generally related to as ‘stare decisis’, signifying to “place by decided issues”.
3.Go to the following website http://www.austlii.edu.au/ and locate this case: Explain briefly how you found it
I opened the site and write the name of case then automatically appear the case of Mildura Office Equipment & Supplies Pty Ltd v Canon Finance Australia Ltd [2006] VSC 42 (16 February 2006) appear (now named to as Mildura).
4.The Mildura case concerns the meaning of a unilateral contract, define a unilateral contract.
This is the agreement in which just a party creates pledge of an express, or starts a presentation devoid of initial securing a mutual conformity from the other party. Unilateral contract is whether statements of defendant in humorist performance at conference of dealers consisted a contractual proposal, afterward established by procurement of plaintiff of economics business in favor of the defendant whether dealings also indistinct and unsure whether reflection stipulated whether accessibility of advantages confined to present dealers.
