英国论文代写：平均成本
英国论文代写：平均成本
从以上的计算结果可以看出，情景5和情景6的蛋糕产量与生产蛋糕的面包的数量之间的比例最高。因此，这两种情况都是最佳生产方式。在这种情况6中，生产的35个蛋糕被认为是最佳的，因为比情况5更多的蛋糕被生产出来，这意味着更高的产量有助于进一步的经济规模。
以上是应用规模经济的理论。考虑到面包师的劳动力成本在上面解释的所有情况下都是恒定的，情景5和情景6的生产率是最高的。换句话说，这两种情况下的产量与生产的蛋糕数量相比成本最低。
英国论文代写：平均成本
如果一家公司开办新工厂，工厂的生产就会越来越好。因此，工厂可以产生更多的单位投入产出。因此，随着企业规模越来越大，企业的平均成本越来越低。作为一个大拇指规则，规模较大的企业生产成本较低。这个概念可以用两家鞋业公司的例子来解释：路易吉的意大利精品鞋和耐克。耐克在印度尼西亚的大型工厂生产鞋子。然后将它们分别运送到世界各地，每个容器装满10万个鞋子。另一方面，Luigi在两个员工的车库里生产鞋子。耐克拥有路易吉所不具备的经济规模。但是，如果路易吉成长起来，平均总成本就会下降（Sullivan＆Sheffrin，2003）。
英国论文代写：平均成本
From the calculations above, it is clear that Scenario 5 and Scenario 6 has the highest ratio between the cakes produced and the number of bakers that produced the cake. Therefore, both these scenarios are the most optimum production set up. Out of these Scenario 6 showing the 35 cakes produced is taken as the most optimal as more cakes produced than in Scenario 5, meaning higher production that helps further economies of scale.
The theory of economies of scale is applied above. Considering the labor cost of the bakers as constant in all scenarios explained above, the scenario 5 and scenario 6 has the highest production rate to cost. In other words, the production in these two scenarios has the least relative cost to the number of cakes produced.
英国论文代写：平均成本
If a firm starts growing by opening new factories, the production in the factory gets better and better. As a result, the factory can produce more output per unit of input. Thus, the firm experiences increasingly lower average cost as the firm grows bigger. As a thumb rule, bigger sized firms have lower production cost. This concept can be explained with the illustration of two shoe companies: Luigi’s Fine Italian Shoes and Nike. Nike manufactures shoes in huge factories located in Indonesia. It then ships them all parts of the world in containers of 100,000 shoes in each. On the other hand Luigi manufactures shoes in garage with two employees. Nike has the economies in size that is not enjoyed by Luigi. However, if Luigi grows in business, there would be a decline in average total costs (Sullivan & Sheffrin 2003).
