生态环境的我们都有自己的观点和想法将在但有时缺乏媒介成为阻碍我们的方式。现在的问题是我们一直仍然只在报纸上时代,我们中有多少人会更能占据这个原因和产生影响。这将取决于我们强烈支持大出版社将达到和帮助我们与观众的联系。正在讨论污染水平上升和水力压裂的情况下有许多事件可以保持与网络媒体由于政治限制但我们很快看到迷你剪辑上传和共享在社交媒体中,突然的消息甚至跨越国界进行讨论。这就是选择媒体的重要性,根据性质的严重性,我们可以呼吁多久出来世界(Mark Kinver BBC新闻,2013)。的一篇文章,可能是由一个流行的作家写的亲水力压裂,人会很容易影响他/她的意见和博客的时代,几乎任何我们可以挑战这些人将我们的问题和意见从而把另一边的故事基于我们的真实体验。如果没有网络就很难把它考虑的政治压力。
In case of Ecology and Environment we all have our share of opinions and thoughts to put across but at times the lack of medium becomes a hindrance in our way. Now the question to ask is had we been still in the newspaper only era, how many of us would be even able to take up this cause and have an impact. Well it would depend on how strong our backing would be by big publishing houses that would give the reach and help us connect with the audience. With rising pollution levels and cases of fracking being discussed there are many incidents that can be kept out of media due to political restrictions but with internet we soon see mini clips being uploaded and shared in social media, suddenly the piece of news is even discussed across borders. Such is the importance of choice of media that based on nature of seriousness; we can take a call on how soon to get it out to the world (Mark Kinver, BBC News, 2013). In case of an article which could have been written by a popular author who is pro Fracking, people out there would be easily influenced by his/her opinions and with age of blogs, literally any of us can challenge these people by putting out our questions and opinions thus bringing the other side of the story based on our real experience. Had there been no internet it would have been very difficult to bring it out considering the political pressure.