英国代写：中国鸦片贸易斗争
英国代写：中国鸦片贸易斗争。中国殖民历史上的鸦片贸易体系是一个更大的国际贸易网络的一部分。这不仅仅是贩卖鸦片，发放许可证，或者为帝国主义的贸易秩序而战，它更像是一场反抗压迫的斗争，一种反文化的形式。因此，布鲁的主要论点是，鸦片战争和贸易的影响具有国际规模，中国对毒品的反对和英国在贸易中的利益必须被视为不仅仅是与贸易有关的斗争。这是一场反对压迫的斗争，意识形态差异的斗争，跨文化交流问题的斗争，以及从各自社会内部理解的更多问题。接下来英国代写专家将对中国鸦片贸易斗争进行以下分析。
Blue支持这一论点的要点如下。首先，布鲁认为，在与毒品作斗争的背景下，鸦片战争的历史表明，即使是合法化和控制这种物质也会导致许多压迫和反叛行动，而传统上只有在毒品可能被完全禁止的情况下才会出现反叛行动。禁止毒品并不是造成问题的原因，而是在殖民主义和帝国主义自由贸易的框架下使毒品合法化和控制毒品才是造成问题的原因。印度政府、英国政府、中国消费者、帕西人、中国商人和西班牙人等各方都带来了各自的意识形态、差异和文化，因此鸦片销售和管制制度成为了从殖民者手中开始跨文化对立和争取更多自由的理想开端。意识形态迥异的群体通过国际贸易的鸦片体系在斗争中被买到了一起。布鲁提出的另一个关键观点是，市场是社会收缩的，而不仅仅是中国人消费或殖民者贪婪的结果。这一点再次表明，鸦片贸易体系具有社会和政治影响，有助于反对压迫和霸权，争取自由贸易。随着时间的推移，它导致了更广泛的政治运动的动员。
作者的论点是令人信服的，因为即使在当代，一些与贸易有关的斗争，如石油的斗争，也不仅仅是关于贸易。阻碍两国关系的不仅仅是与贸易有关的分歧。为了获取资源、霸权化并最终为一个国家获得资源，导致这个国家不承认另一个国家提出的意识形态差异和反对是有效的。正如鸦片战争和斗争所表明的那样，有许多广泛的社会和政治问题可能在贸易中发挥作用，从女权运动、反奴隶制、宗教、意识形态差异或跨文化交流。此外，在某种程度上，广泛的合作导致了对鸦片贸易的镇压。因此，在某种程度上，当国家谈判合作和相互理解时，可以做得很好。
The Opium system situated in the colonial history of China was part of a larger network of international trade. It was not just about selling opium, licensing it, or fighting for an imperialist trade order, but it was more of a fight against oppression, a form of counter culture. As Blue states, if the fight was not for Opium, it could just have been for some other trade commodity that China wanted to have freedom to sell or prohibit. Hence, Blue’s main argument is that the Opium war and trade influence was of international magnitude, and Chinese objections to the drug and British interests in the trade must be viewed as more than just a trade related struggle. It was a struggle against oppression, struggle of ideological differences, cross cultural communication issues and more, as understand from within their respective societies.
Blue’s key points for supporting the argument are as follows. Firstly, Blue argues that in the context of fighting against a drug, the history of the opium wars shows that even legalization and controlling the substance led to much oppression, and rebellious action which traditionally would have been expected only in situations where the drug was probably completely prohibited. Prohibiting the drug was not causing the issue but legalizing it and controlling it in a framework situated in colonialism and Imperialistic free trade was causing the issue. All of them involved, such as the Indian Government, the British Government, the Chinese consumers, Parsee, Chinese merchants and Sephardic, brought their ideologies, differences and cultures and hence the opium sales and regulation system become an ideal opening for the start of cross-cultural oppositions and struggle for more freedom from the colonizers. Ideologically disparate groups were bought together in the struggle through the opium system of international trade. Another key point that Blue puts forth is that the markets are socially contracted, and is not just a result of Chinese consumption or the greed of the colonizers. Once again, this point imparts that the Opium system of trade had a social and political influence, one that contributed to the struggle against oppression and hegemony and for free trade. Over time, it led to the mobilization of broader political movements.
The author’s argument is convincing because even in contemporary times, some trade related struggles, such as the struggle for oil is not just about the trade. There are more than trade related differences that get into the way. The need to access a resource, hegemonize it and ultimately secure it for one country, leads the country to not recognize the ideological difference and opposition raised by another country as a valid one. As the Opium wars and the struggles indicate, there are many broad spectrum social and political issues that could play a role in the trade from women’s rights movements, anti-slavery, religion, ideological differences or cross-cultural communication. In addition, the broad level of collaboration at some point was what led to the suppression of Opium trade. Therefore, at some level, countries can do well when they negotiate to collaborate and understand each other.
以上内容就是英国代写专家对中国鸦片贸易斗争的分析与讨论。如果同学们没有足够的时间来完成英语文与作业，论文代写推荐选择英国论文代写Advancedthesis服务公司。因为其服务公司的论文创作专家团队由高素质和经验丰富的学术作家组成，保障论文创作质量与合理的论文代写价格。除此之外，还为留学生提供英国essay代写、英国作业代写、毕业论文代写等服务，留学生们可以扫描本网站二维码随时在线咨询哦!
