英国论文迟交：概念化替代工程方法
英国论文迟交：概念化替代工程方法
概念化替代工程方法，并根据适当的标准评估潜在的结果，以证明最佳解决方案的选择。虽然整个团队已经提出了开发这个系统的方法，但是我们仍然确保我们有足够的替代工程方法来帮助实现预期的目标。可选的工程方法可以在设计模型和开发阶段中看到。在项目开发中，我们还将螺旋模型放在第二位。类似地，还考虑了其他物理体系结构选项。为确保预算得到满足，采用了替代材料、技术和工艺。每个备选方案都要根据可靠性、适当性、预算、时间和可用性进行评估。在此基础上，选择最优解。严格审查和应用相关的标准和规范，以支持工程学科和指定的专业。在整个系统的发展过程中，已经编制和遵守了业务守则和行为守则。
本文以澳大利亚废物管理协会1994年颁布的《作业守则》第七版为指导手册。该系统的工作方式是根据废物运输、处置设施、工作健康和安全以及信息的道德使用的标准确定的。新南威尔士州的相关工程学科和专业也采用了EPA给出的更好的实践指南(EPA, 2012)。总的来说，在整个设计和开发过程中都遵循了自我和专业的行为。在指定的工程学科中，识别、量化、减轻和管理与工程应用相关的技术、健康、环境、安全和其他相关风险。如前所述，本项目的风险经理负责检测技术、健康、环境和安全方面的风险。在适当的风险度量、预先构建的应急计划和风险矩阵的帮助下，风险经理将列出项目生命周期中出现的、存在的和已解决的风险(Philips, 2003)。
英国论文迟交：概念化替代工程方法
Conceptualises alternative engineering approaches and evaluates potential outcomes against appropriate criteria to justify an optimal solution choice.While the approaches to develop this system are already proposed by the entire team, we have still made sure we have sufficient alternative engineering approaches that will help achieve the desired objective. The alternative engineering approaches can be visible in the design model and the development stages. We have also given second priority to the spiral model in the project development. Similarly, alternative physical architecture options have been considered. To ensure that the budget is met, alternate materials, technologies and processes have been followed. Every alternative is evaluated in terms of reliability, appropriateness, budget, timing and usability. Based on these metrics, the optimal solution is chosen. Critically reviews and applies relevant standards and codes of practice underpinning the engineering discipline and nominated specialisations.Throughout the development of the system, codes of practice and conduct were already prepared and followed.
The 7th edition of Code of Practice, 1994 given by Waste Management Association of Australia has been used as the handbook for this paper. The system working style is decided based on the standards given for waste transportation, disposal facility, work health and safety and ethical usage of information. Better practice guideline given by EPA, NSW has also been adopted for relevant engineering disciplines and specializations (EPA, 2012). On the whole, the self and professional conduct have been followed throughout this design and development. Identifies, quantifies, mitigates and manages technical, health, environmental, safety and other contextual risks associated with engineering application in the designated engineering discipline.As already mentioned, risk manager in this project is responsible to detect the risks in terms of technical, health, environmental and safety aspects. With the help of proper risk metrics, pre – built contingency plans and risk matrix in hand, risk manager will list out the emerging, existing and solved risks during the lifecycle of this project (Philips, 2003).
