代写英文论文：宗教的影响力
代写英文论文：宗教的影响力
宗教，除基督教外，或就此而言，任何宗教都不鼓吹对人类的歧视，不论其背景、种族或出生条件如何。因此，富兰克林有一句话:“你看到一个勤奋工作的人吗?”他将站在国王面前”，永远不能被视为对劳动者的神圣证明和赞美。圣经只是富兰克林带来的一句话吗?这不也是建立平等，帮助所有人，不贪婪吗?当然,它是。如果资本主义的精神受到宗教的影响而不受质疑，那么要么是宗教宣扬的道德冷漠，要么是资本主义对新教伦理的错误解读。最简单的原因是资本主义在世界各地的不良影响，资本主义给少数人带来了财富，给大众带来了饥饿，给大众带来了歧视，给贫富差距带来了不可逆转的影响，给大众带来了社会孤立(Duhrssen 233-236)。
职业道德的宗教影响是可以理解的，但不能用在那些会造成两极分化的经济差异的作品中。资本主义在社会的某一部分创造了更多的财富集中，把大众撇在一边。以劳动工资为代价创造财富和创造利润的理想本身就是一个矛盾的理论，需要立即予以反对。如果一份工资对资本家来说是一种成本，他怎么能高兴地不断提高工资以减少利润呢?他绝不会那样做。资本主义理论本身是没有根据的。如果新教伦理在这里得到应用，工人们竭尽全力为他们的资本主义主人服务，那么为什么今天的工人们不快乐呢?为什么他们的收入停滞不前或增长缓慢，而他们的资本主义主人的收入却像马一样增长?
代写英文论文：宗教的影响力
Religion in addition to Christianity or for the matter any religion does not preach for discrimination of humans irrespective of their background or race or birth conditions. Thus, Franklin’s one statement, “Seest you a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings”, can never be taken as a divine proof and praise for the working man. Is the bible just one sentence, which Franklin brings here? Is it not also about the establishing of equality, helping all others, not being greedy? Certainly, it is. If the spirit of capitalism is religiously influenced and not to be questioned, then either the religion preaches moral apathy or capitalism is the wrongly interpreted message from the protestant ethics. The simplest reason is the ill-impacts of capitalism across the world, which has delivered nothing but wealth for a handful, hunger for the masses, discrimination for the masses, irreversible for the income gap between the rich and the poor and social isolation for the masses (Duhrssen 233-236).
Religious influence of work ethics is understandable, but it is not to be employed in works that is the seed of creating polarised economic disparity. Capitalism has created more wealth concentration in one section of society, leaving aside the masses by themselves. The ideal of wealth creation and profit generation at the cost of labour wages is a contradictory theory in itself, demanding immediate opposition. If a wage is a cost to the capitalist, how will he be happy to consistently upgrading the wage to reduce his profit? He never would do that. The theory of capitalism itself is without basis. If the protestant ethic is applied here, the workers work their entire strength and give all they can to their capitalist master, then why are the workers not happy today? Why have their income remained stagnant or grown at a snail’s pace, whereas their capitalist master’s income has grown as a horses pace?
