個人陳述：情境知识

個人陳述：情境知识

Haraway在她的“情境知识:女性主义的科学问题和部分视角的特权”讨论了客观主义和边界这两个问题都不能在一个陈述，语境，社会互动和动态中真正定义给它们一个意义。一个占主导地位的群体的眼睛所认为的目标，不会从另一个人的角度来看。事实上，试图以书面形式给出硬性的边界或目标，甚至在永久的现实世界中都是行不通的，因为作者指出，即使我们是永久的凡人，世界上也没有最终的控制。

個人陳述：情境知识

现在对我所分析的图片进行理解，我会说一个人看到的是什么。例如，它是考虑纯粹客观的观点。没有意义和任何其他感情，这是人们握手的画面。当一个人知道了背景，如果看到的人没有把任何情感添加到他们的理解中，那么他们就不能充分地欣赏这幅画。只有当一个人把自己在这种类似的情况,失去非常重要的镜头客观世界的教他们,看看图片与情感,人的抗议和保护示威者和non-protestor,他们能理解这幅画的意义。我相信通过借用Haraway的图片来看看这幅画是很有趣的，因为它实际上显示了这幅画的重要性。

個人陳述：情境知识

Haraway in her ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial perspective’ discuss objectivism and boundaries which are both tricky cannot really be defined in a statement, context, social interactions and dynamics give them a meaning. What is considered objective from the eyes of a dominant group would not be from another’s perspective. In fact, trying to give hard boundaries or objectives in writing might not even work in the permanent real world as author states that there is no final control in the world even when we are permanently mortal.

個人陳述：情境知识
Now taking that understanding to the picture I have been analyzing, I would say what one sees is what one gets. For instance, it is to consider the purely objective view point. Devoid of meaning and any other sentiment, this is the picture of people shaking hands. When one knows the background, if the person viewing the picture does not add any emotions into their understanding, then they would not be able to appreciate the picture fully. Only when a person puts themselves in such a similar situation, lose their very critical lens of objectivity as the world has taught them, and look at the picture with emotion, the protest and the people who are protecting both protestor and non-protestor, can they understand the significance of the picture. I believe that it is interesting to look at the picture through lends of Haraway as it actually shows how significance of the picture can really be read.