曼彻斯特论文代写：技术和产品创新

曼彻斯特论文代写：技术和产品创新

在社会上，人们普遍倾向于技术进步。人们开始在他们的产品中寻找创新。他们需要更多的功能。就发达国家而言，竞争对手的数量在增加，人们能够满足所有的基本要求。人们正在寻求扩大其功能和增加对其产品的技术支持。PEST分析表明，公司没有把重心放在多媒体上以迎合消费者，这是公司失败的原因。有必要分析一个公司的竞争对手，以便了解公司失败的原因。为了了解这家公司失败的根源，规定了波特五力分析。公司面临着激烈的竞争。巴诺书店是主要的竞争对手。除此之外，亚马逊公司对Borders公司也有一定的了解，因为他们是这家公司的合作伙伴。

曼彻斯特论文代写：技术和产品创新
来自各行各业的商业和电子书商店也在大幅增长。这导致了公司的重大问题(Hooper, and Rawls, 2014)。这家公司没有进入壁垒，因为它是一家老牌公司。赋予消费者的权力很大。这家公司发现消费者的议价能力很强。由于公司的数字化发展，替代威胁变得明显。公司无法想出办法来防止这些替换。就图书公司而言，供应商是作者、出版商、艺术家和内容作者。在这种情况下，传统零售企业也面临着与边境企业同样的问题。他们严重依赖零售和传统出版业。这导致了公司的倒闭。

曼彻斯特论文代写：技术和产品创新

Socially, there was a general preference towards the technological advancements. People started to look for innovation in their products. They wanted more functionality. In the case of developed nations, there is an increase in the number of competitors and people had access to all the basic requirements. The people were looking for extended functionalities and increase in technological support for their products. The PEST analysis suggests that the company not focusing on the multimedia to cater to the consumers which was the reason for the failure of the company. There is a need to analyze the competitors of a company in order to understand the reason for the failure of the company. The porters five force analysis has been prescribed in order to understand the root of failure of this company. There was high level of competition for the company. There was Barnes and Noble that was the major competitors. Apart from this, Amazon company had a working knowledge of Borders Inc because they were partners with this firm.

曼彻斯特论文代写：技术和产品创新
The commerce and eBook stores from around the spectrum was also increasing profoundly. This caused the company major issues (Hooper, and Rawls, 2014).The company had no barrier to entry as it was an established company. There was high power vested on the consumers. The bargaining power of the consumers was found to be high for this company. Threat of substitution become pronounced owing to the digital growth of the company. The company was not able to devise ways to prevent these substitutions. In the case of the book companies, the suppliers are the writers, publishers, artist and the content writers. In this case, the traditional retail companies were also facing the same issues as that of Borders. There was heavy dependence on the retail and conventional publishing. This had caused the company to fail.