英国论文代写：网络诽谤
英国论文代写：网络诽谤
网络诽谤是指为了降低个人或组织的可信度而发布虚假新闻的行为。原告是那些遭受网络诽谤后果的人，他们有权要求自己的信誉，并确保自己的行为是正直的。原告应当向法院证明，该个人或者组织发表了恶意诋毁原告的虚假陈述。原告应证明被告只是发布了一个虚假的事实，即被告认为这是一个谎言，但仍然继续这样做。网络诽谤是一个重要的问题，已成为许多国家的首要关注。人们对言论自由和诽谤性内容的观念感到困惑。这些问题在下一节中进行了解释。在英国宪法中，民主的基本原则之一被定义为言论自由。这些都得到欧洲联盟《人权公约》意识形态的支持。《欧洲人权公约》第10条规定，所有人民都应发表意见。人们有权评估自己的观点，表达自己对事件的看法。这是社会上所有个人的首要任务。他们可以有自己的观点，并传授自己的观点。
这是赋予全体人民的基本权利。同样的意识形态也适用于所有的媒体。国家不能以任何方式阻止言论自由或新闻自由。他们被允许表达自己的感情，而不用担心受到报复。第29 J条规定，人民可以无所畏惧地信奉任何宗教。同时，他们也不应该表达或表达对其他宗教的反对。人们在实践自己的意识形态，形成自己的观点。然而，法院区分意见和事实。这种微妙的理解形式在表达观点时很重要。如果某一特定的虚假陈述被作为意见发布，则被认为是诽谤。诽谤是一种行为，声称一个声明是事实，即使它不是真的。诽谤法可能非常严格。这在凯恩斯诉莫迪案(2012)中得到了呼应，在该案中，一条关于职业板球运动员的推特被认为是诽谤(汤普森，2013)。法庭要求被告支付9万英镑以赔偿损失。
英国论文代写：网络诽谤
Online defamation is the act of presenting false news about an individuals or an organization in an effort to reduce their credibility. The plaintiffs are the people who suffer the ramifications of online defamation and they have rights to claim their credibility and ensure that they have acted with integrity. The plaintiffs should prove to the courts that the individual or organization had stated a false statement with the malicious intent of discrediting of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs should prove that the defendant had simply posted a false fact that the defendant considered it to be a lie, nevertheless continued to do so. Online defamation is an important issue that has become the primary concern in many nations. There is a conundrum that the people feel about the notions of Freedom of speech and defamatory content. These have been explained in the following section. In the UK constitution, one of the fundamental tenets of democracy has been defined as Freedom of speech. These have been bolstered by the ideology of the human rights convention of the European Union. Article 10 of the European convention of human rights states that all the people to express their opinion. People have their right to gauge a opinion and state their emotions regarding the events. This is a primary mandate for all the individuals in the society. They can have opinion and impart their viewpoints.
This is the fundamental basic right that is given to all the people. The same ideology can be applied to all the media outlets. The states cannot prevent the freedom of expression or the press freedom in any way. They are allowed to voice their sentiments without any fear of retribution. Article 29 J states that the people are allowed to practice any religion without fear. At the same time, they also should not express or voice disapproval of other religions. People are practice their own ideology and form their own opinion. However the courts differentiate between opinion and facts. This nuanced form of understanding is important while expressing the opinion. If a particular false statement is posted as an opinion it is considered to be libel. Libel is the act of professing a statement as a fact even though it is not true. Libel laws can be very stringent. This is echoed in the case of Cairns v Modi (2012) where the tweet about a professional cricketer was considered to be libel (Thompson, 2013). The courts asked the defendant to pay £90,000 in order to compensate for the damage.
