研究结果表明，随机漫步的各种测试结果表明，随机漫步在DSE中是不存在的。这种随机性的偏差可能是由于市场上的流动性不足，市场参与者缺乏经验，交易清淡(Abbas, 2014)。该研究为投资者提供了证据和暗示，说明交易量和历史价格，以及对大马士革证券交易所市场回报的预测。因此，投资者有可能产生不正常的利润。然而，重要的是，投资者认为，由于缺乏流动性和效率低下的市场(Abbas, 2014)，存在重大损失的可能性。由于DSE既是新生市场，又是年轻市场，因此，美国证券交易委员会(Securities and Exchange Commission，简称sec)需要对信息效率的提高进行一定程度的评估，并向投资者灌输信心。
另一篇由Fama所做的贡献，并在有效市场假说的基础上进行研究的文章，是由John Armour和Brian Cheffins开发的，其主题是股票市场价格和企业控制市场(Armour and Cheffins, 2016)。在本研究中，Fama的贡献被扩展到对公司收购的评估中，以了解公司的股票市场和股票价格。
The overall findings made from the research indicate that the variety of tests for the random walks lead to the conclusion that the random walks are absent in the DSE. The deviation from the randomness can be due to the illiquidity in the market, experience lacked by the participants of the market and thin trading (Abbas, 2014). The study provides with the evidence and implication for the investors that the volume traded and the historical prices and enable prediction of the market returns in the Damascus securities exchange. Therefore, there is a possibility of making abnormal profits by the investors. However, it is essential that the investors consider that there is a probability of major losses due to the illiquid and inefficient market (Abbas, 2014). Since the DSE is both nascent and young market, the Securities and Exchange Commission is required to apply certain measured for the information efficiency improvement and for instilling the confidence among the investors.
Another article that the contribution made by Fama and developed the study on the basis of the efficient market hypothesis is developed by John Armour and Brian Cheffins with the topic of the stock market prices and the market for corporate control (Armour and Cheffins, 2016). The contributions of Fama are extended in this study for evaluating the corporate takeover with understanding of the stock market and stock prices of the organization.